This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The Defendant's probation was revoked by the district court due to her failure to report to probation. The Defendant argued that her failure to report was not willful (paras 1-2).
Procedural History
- District Court, Lea County: The district court revoked the Defendant's probation (para 1).
Parties' Submissions
- Appellant: The Defendant argued that the district court erred in revoking her probation because the evidence was insufficient to prove that her failure to report was willful (para 2).
- Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Did the district court err in revoking the Defendant's probation due to insufficient evidence of willful failure to report?
Disposition
- The New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision to revoke the Defendant's probation (para 1).
Reasons
Per Hanisee J. (Medina C.J. and Yohalem J. concurring): The Court found that the Defendant's memorandum in opposition did not present any new facts, law, or arguments that would persuade the Court that the district court abused its discretion or committed reversible error. The Court emphasized that merely repeating earlier arguments does not meet the requirement to point out specific errors of law and fact. Therefore, the Court affirmed the district court's decision to revoke the Defendant's probation (paras 1-2).