AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The case involves a dispute between the Petitioner-Appellee and the Respondent-Appellant. The specific facts and events leading to the case are not provided in the decision.

Procedural History

  • District Court, Lea County, presided by Judge William G. Shoobridge: The District Court issued a decision in favor of the Petitioner-Appellee.

Parties' Submissions

  • Petitioner-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Respondent-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • Whether the District Court's decision in favor of the Petitioner-Appellee should be affirmed.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court.

Reasons

Per Bustamante J. (Wechsler and Vanzi JJ. concurring): The Court of Appeals proposed a summary affirmance in its calendar notice, citing reasons that were not opposed by the Respondent-Appellant. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired. Consequently, the Court affirmed the District Court's decision. (headnotes)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.