This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The Defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained by the State. The specific circumstances leading to the motion, including the nature of the evidence and the events surrounding its collection, are not detailed in the decision.
Procedural History
- District Court of Chaves County: The district court granted the Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. (headnotes)
Parties' Submissions
- Appellant (State of New Mexico): The State did not file a memorandum in opposition to the proposed summary affirmance by the Court of Appeals. (headnotes)
- Appellee (Defendant): [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the district court erred in granting the Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. (headnotes)
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to grant the Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. (headnotes)
Reasons
Per Castillo J. (Bustamante and Vanzi JJ. concurring): The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision for the reasons outlined in its notice of proposed summary disposition. The State did not oppose the proposed affirmance, and no further arguments or evidence were presented to challenge the district court’s ruling. (headnotes)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.