AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The Plaintiff-Appellee brought a case against the Defendant-Appellant, a car dealership, and a bank, alleging issues related to a transaction involving the purchase or financing of a vehicle. Specific details of the events leading to the dispute are not provided in the decision.

Procedural History

  • District Court of Bernalillo County: The trial court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff-Appellee.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellant (Defendant-Appellant, Hamilton Big Country Ford): [Not applicable or not found]
  • Appellee (Plaintiff-Appellee, Dan S. Regalado): [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • Whether the trial court's decision in favor of the Plaintiff-Appellee should be affirmed.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the trial court's decision.

Reasons

Per Bustamante J. (Vigil and Garcia JJ. concurring): The Court of Appeals proposed a summary affirmance in its calendar notice, outlining the reasons for affirming the trial court's decision. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed by the Defendant-Appellant, and the time to do so expired. Consequently, the Court affirmed the trial court's decision without further analysis. (headnotes)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.