This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The Defendant was involved in a legal dispute with the State of New Mexico. The specific events or circumstances leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.
Procedural History
- District Court, Roosevelt County, presided by Judge Drew D. Tatum: The District Court issued a decision in favor of the Plaintiff (State of New Mexico). The details of the holding are not provided.
Parties' Submissions
- Plaintiff-Appellee (State of New Mexico): [Not applicable or not found]
- Defendant-Appellant (Christopher Roybal): [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the District Court's decision in favor of the Plaintiff should be upheld.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the District Court's decision.
Reasons
Per Roderick T. Kennedy J. (Bustamante and Vigil JJ. concurring):
The Court of Appeals proposed a summary affirmance in its notice of proposed disposition, citing reasons that were not contested by the Defendant-Appellant. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed within the allotted time. Consequently, the Court affirmed the District Court's decision. (headnotes)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.