This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The case involves a dispute between a petitioner, operating a law firm, and a Metropolitan Court Judge. The petitioner sought relief against the judge's actions in a legal matter. The specifics of the underlying events leading to the dispute are not detailed in the decision.
Procedural History
- District Court, Bernalillo County: The District Court, presided over by Judge Geraldine E. Rivera, issued a decision in the matter. The details of the holding are not provided.
Parties' Submissions
- Petitioner-Appellant: The petitioner, representing themselves, appealed the District Court's decision. The specific arguments made are not detailed. (N/A)
- Respondent-Appellee: The Metropolitan Court Judge, represented by the Attorney General, defended the District Court's decision. The specific arguments made are not detailed.
Legal Issues
- Whether the District Court's decision should be affirmed.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's decision.
Reasons
Per Bustamante J. (Fry C.J. and Castillo J. concurring):
The Court of Appeals proposed a summary affirmance in its calendar notice, citing reasons that were not opposed by the petitioner. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed within the allowed time. Consequently, the Court affirmed the District Court's decision. (headnotes)