AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The Defendant was subjected to a breath alcohol test, the results of which were later challenged. The case revolves around the admissibility of these test results.

Procedural History

  • District Court of San Juan County: Denied the Defendant’s motion to suppress the breath alcohol test results. (headnotes)

Parties' Submissions

  • Defendant-Appellant: Argued that the breath alcohol test results should be suppressed. (N/A)
  • State (Plaintiff-Appellee): Did not oppose the Court of Appeals' proposed summary disposition to reverse the district court’s decision. (headnotes)

Legal Issues

  • Whether the district court erred in denying the Defendant’s motion to suppress the breath alcohol test results. (headnotes)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s denial of the Defendant’s motion to suppress the breath alcohol test results. (headnotes)

Reasons

Per Wechsler J. (Castillo and Garcia JJ. concurring): The Court of Appeals had issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, suggesting that the district court’s decision to deny the motion to suppress the breath alcohol test results should be reversed. The State did not oppose this proposed disposition. Consequently, the Court reversed the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in its notice of proposed summary disposition. (headnotes)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.