AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The case involves a dispute among family members regarding unspecified matters. The Plaintiffs, a married couple represented by a next friend, brought the case against the Defendant and two other individuals. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.

Procedural History

  • District Court, Rio Arriba County: The District Court issued a decision, but the details of the holding are not provided in the memorandum opinion.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiffs-Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Defendant-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Other Defendants: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the lack of a memorandum opposing summary dismissal. (headnotes)

Disposition

  • The appeal was dismissed. (headnotes)

Reasons

Per Cynthia A. Fry, Chief Judge (Wechsler and Vanzi JJ. concurring): The Court proposed summary dismissal in the calendar notice and noted that no memorandum opposing the dismissal was filed within the required time. As a result, the appeal was dismissed. (headnotes)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.