AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The case involves a dispute between the Petitioner-Appellee and the Respondent-Appellant. The specific facts and events leading to the case are not provided in the decision.

Procedural History

  • District Court of Bernalillo County: The District Court issued a decision in favor of the Petitioner-Appellee.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellant (Respondent): Filed a memorandum in support of the proposed summary disposition. (headnotes)
  • Appellee (Petitioner): Did not file a memorandum opposing the proposed summary dismissal. (headnotes)

Legal Issues

  • Whether the District Court's decision in favor of the Petitioner-Appellee should be reversed.

Disposition

  • The decision of the District Court was reversed. (headnotes)

Reasons

Per Vigil J. (Kennedy and Robles JJ. concurring): The Court of Appeals proposed a summary reversal in its notice of proposed disposition. The Respondent-Appellant supported this proposal by filing a memorandum in favor of the summary disposition. The Petitioner-Appellee did not file any opposition to the proposed summary dismissal, and the time for doing so had expired. Based on these circumstances, the Court reversed the District Court's decision. (headnotes)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.