This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The case involves a legal matter concerning the Defendant and an Attorney-Appellant. The specific events or circumstances leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.
Procedural History
- District Court of Doña Ana County: Summary dismissal was proposed, and no memorandum opposing the dismissal was filed. The time for filing such a memorandum expired.
Parties' Submissions
- Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
- Defendant: [Not applicable or not found]
- Attorney-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the summary dismissal proposed by the District Court was appropriate in the absence of a memorandum opposing the dismissal.
Disposition
- The appeal was dismissed.
Reasons
Per Castillo J. (Sutin and Vanzi JJ. concurring): The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because no memorandum opposing the proposed summary dismissal was filed within the required timeframe. The absence of opposition to the dismissal led the Court to conclude that the summary dismissal was appropriate.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.