This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The Defendant appealed a decision related to the imposition of a judgment and sentence originally issued by the magistrate court. The appeal arose from the district court's dismissal of the Defendant's de novo appeal and the remand of the case to the magistrate court for enforcement of its original judgment and sentence.
Procedural History
- Magistrate Court: Issued the original judgment and sentence. (N/A)
- District Court: Dismissed the Defendant's de novo appeal and remanded the case to the magistrate court for imposition of the original judgment and sentence.
Parties' Submissions
- Appellant (Defendant): [Not applicable or not found]
- Appellee (State): Conceded that the district court's decision should be reversed for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals' notice of proposed summary disposition. (headnotes)
Legal Issues
- Whether the district court erred in dismissing the Defendant's de novo appeal and remanding the case to the magistrate court for imposition of the original judgment and sentence.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals reversed the district court's decision. (headnotes)
Reasons
Per Castillo J. (Kennedy and Robles JJ. concurring):
The Court of Appeals issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, suggesting that the district court's decision should be reversed. The State responded with a memorandum conceding that reversal was appropriate for the reasons outlined in the notice. Based on this concession and the reasoning in the notice of proposed summary disposition, the Court reversed the district court's decision. (headnotes)