This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The Plaintiff, a financial institution, initiated legal proceedings against the Defendant, a business entity, in relation to a dispute. The specific facts and events leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.
Procedural History
- District Court of McKinley County: The District Court proposed summary dismissal of the case.
Parties' Submissions
- Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
- Defendant-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the case should be summarily dismissed due to the absence of a memorandum opposing the proposed summary dismissal.
Disposition
- The appeal was dismissed.
Reasons
Per Sutin J. (Fry C.J. and Vigil J. concurring): The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because no memorandum opposing the proposed summary dismissal was filed within the required timeframe. The Court noted that the time for filing such a memorandum had expired, and no further action was taken by the Defendant-Appellant to contest the dismissal. (headnotes)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.