AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The Plaintiff-Appellant filed a case against multiple Defendants-Appellees, including individuals and the Office of the Attorney General. The specific events or disputes leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.

Procedural History

  • District Court, Santa Fe County, presided by Judge Daniel A. Sanchez: The District Court issued a decision that was appealed by the Plaintiff-Appellant.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Defendants-Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • Whether the District Court's decision should be affirmed in the absence of a memorandum opposing the proposed summary affirmance.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the District Court's decision.

Reasons

Per Roderick T. Kennedy J. (Cynthia A. Fry CJ and Robert E. Robles J. concurring):

The Court of Appeals proposed a summary affirmance in its notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed by the Plaintiff-Appellant, and the time for filing such a memorandum had expired. Consequently, the Court affirmed the District Court's decision. (headnotes)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.