AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The Defendant was charged with failing to wear a seatbelt while traveling in a motor vehicle, in violation of Section 66-7-372 of the New Mexico Safety Belt Use Act. The Defendant argued that the statute applies only to drivers and not to passengers. Additionally, the Defendant questioned the fairness of being charged for a seatbelt violation when public transportation does not provide safety restraints for passengers.

Procedural History

  • District Court, Sandoval County: The Defendant was found guilty of violating Section 66-7-372 and sentenced accordingly.

Parties' Submissions

  • Defendant-Appellant: Argued that Section 66-7-372 applies only to drivers and not passengers. Additionally, the Defendant contended that it is inconsistent to enforce seatbelt laws for passengers in private vehicles while public transportation lacks similar safety measures.
  • Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • Does Section 66-7-372 of the New Mexico Safety Belt Use Act apply to passengers as well as drivers?

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s judgment and sentence.

Reasons

Per Vigil J. (Fry CJ. and Castillo J. concurring):

The Court held that Section 66-7-372 of the New Mexico Safety Belt Use Act explicitly requires "each occupant" of a motor vehicle to wear a safety belt, without distinguishing between drivers and passengers. The statute is designed to promote traffic safety for all vehicle occupants. The Defendant’s arguments regarding public transportation and the applicability of the statute to passengers were unpersuasive, as the plain language of the statute clearly applies to all occupants of motor vehicles. Consequently, the district court’s judgment and sentence were affirmed.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.