AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The case concerns a dispute over the modification of child support obligations. The Respondent challenged the modification order issued by the district court.

Procedural History

  • District Court, Sandoval County, presided by Judge John F. Davis: Issued an order modifying child support.

Parties' Submissions

  • Respondent-Appellant: Appealed the district court's order modifying child support. No memorandum in opposition to the Court of Appeals' proposed summary disposition was filed. (N/A)
  • Petitioner-Appellee: Filed a memorandum in support of the Court of Appeals' proposed summary disposition.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the appeal should be dismissed for lack of a final order.

Disposition

  • The appeal was dismissed for lack of a final order.

Reasons

Per Cynthia A. Fry, Chief Judge (Wechsler and Vigil JJ. concurring):

The Court of Appeals issued a calendar notice proposing to dismiss the appeal due to the absence of a final order. The Petitioner filed a memorandum supporting the proposed dismissal, while the Respondent failed to file any opposition within the allotted time. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for the reasons outlined in its notice of proposed disposition. (headnotes)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.