This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The case involves a dispute between the Plaintiff-Appellee and the Defendant-Appellant, with a Third-Party Defendant also named. The specific facts and events leading to the case are not provided in the decision.
Procedural History
- District Court of San Miguel County: The District Court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff-Appellee.
Parties' Submissions
- Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
- Defendant-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
- Third-Party Defendant: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the District Court's decision in favor of the Plaintiff-Appellee should be affirmed.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's decision.
Reasons
Per Wechsler J. (Vigil and Vanzi JJ. concurring): The Court of Appeals proposed a summary affirmance in its notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed by the Defendant-Appellant within the allotted time. Consequently, the Court affirmed the District Court's decision. (headnotes)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.