AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The case involves a dispute between the Plaintiff-Appellant and the Defendants-Appellees, including a real estate business and its agents, over unspecified issues. The Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee also brought a claim against a Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. The specific facts leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.

Procedural History

  • District Court of Valencia County: The trial court issued a decision, which is now under appeal.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Defendants-Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Third-Party Defendant-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • Whether the trial court's decision should be affirmed in the absence of a memorandum opposing summary affirmance.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the trial court's decision.

Reasons

Per Vigil J. (Robles and Vanzi JJ. concurring): The Court proposed a summary affirmance in its notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed within the allowed time. As a result, the Court affirmed the trial court's decision. (headnotes)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.