This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The Defendant was involved in a legal dispute with the City of Rio Rancho. The specific events or circumstances leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.
Procedural History
- District Court, Sandoval County, presided by Judge John F. Davis: The District Court dismissed the Defendant's case and denied a motion to reconsider. (headnotes)
Parties' Submissions
- Plaintiff (City of Rio Rancho): Filed a memorandum in support of the proposed summary affirmance as set forth in the Court of Appeals' calendar notice. (headnotes)
- Defendant (Dale Frost): Did not file a memorandum in opposition to the proposed summary affirmance. (headnotes)
Legal Issues
- Whether the District Court's dismissal of the case and denial of the motion to reconsider were appropriate.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's order of dismissal and the denial of the motion to reconsider. (headnotes)
Reasons
Per Cynthia A. Fry, Chief Judge (Bustamante and Sutin JJ. concurring):
The Court of Appeals issued a calendar notice proposing summary affirmance of the District Court's decision. The Plaintiff filed a memorandum supporting the proposed affirmance, while the Defendant failed to file a memorandum in opposition within the allotted time. Based on the reasons outlined in the calendar notice, the Court affirmed the District Court's dismissal of the case and denial of the motion to reconsider. (headnotes)