This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The Plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider an order compelling arbitration in a dispute with the Defendant, a financial institution. The Plaintiff opposed the arbitration order but later withdrew her opposition.
Procedural History
- District Court, Santa Fe County: Issued an order compelling arbitration. The Plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider this order, which was partially denied.
Parties' Submissions
- Plaintiff-Appellant: Initially opposed the order compelling arbitration but later withdrew her memorandum in opposition. (N/A)
- Defendant-Appellee: Supported the Court of Appeals' proposed calendar notice affirming the district court's decision.
Legal Issues
- Whether the district court erred in partially denying the Plaintiff's motion to reconsider the order compelling arbitration.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision to partially deny the Plaintiff's motion to reconsider the order compelling arbitration.
Reasons
Per Kennedy J. (Fry and Castillo JJ. concurring): The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision because the Plaintiff withdrew her memorandum in opposition to the Court's proposed calendar notice, and no other opposition was filed within the allowed time. The Court relied on the reasoning set out in its notice of proposed disposition.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.