This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The Worker-Appellant filed a claim against the Employer-Appellee, Tres Hermanos Dairy, under the Workers’ Compensation framework. The specific facts or events leading to the claim are not detailed in the decision.
Procedural History
- Workers’ Compensation Administration, Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge: The Workers’ Compensation Judge issued a decision, which is being appealed in this case.
Parties' Submissions
- Appellant (Worker): [Not applicable or not found]
- Appellee (Employer): [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s decision should be affirmed in the absence of a memorandum opposing summary affirmance.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge.
Reasons
Per Bustamante J. (Vigil and Robles JJ. concurring): The Court proposed a summary affirmance in its calendar notice, outlining the reasons for affirmance. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed by the Appellant, and the time for filing such a memorandum had expired. Consequently, the Court affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.