AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The case involves a dispute between the Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants-Appellees and the Defendants/Counter Claimants-Appellants. The specific facts leading to the case are not provided in the decision.

Procedural History

  • District Court of Doña Ana County, presided by Judge Jerald A. Valentine: The lower court issued a decision in the case. The details of the holding are not provided.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants-Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Defendants/Counter Claimants-Appellants: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • Whether the case should be summarily dismissed due to the lack of opposition to the proposed summary dismissal.

Disposition

  • The appeal was dismissed.

Reasons

Per Castillo J. (Sutin and Vanzi JJ. concurring): The Court proposed summary dismissal in its notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing the summary dismissal was filed by the Defendants/Counter Claimants-Appellants, and the time for filing such opposition had expired. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal. (headnotes)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.