This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The case involves a dispute between a cosmetics company and a laboratory, along with two individual defendants, regarding unspecified issues. The details of the underlying events leading to the case are not provided in the decision.
Procedural History
- District Court of Bernalillo County: The District Court proposed summary dismissal of the case.
Parties' Submissions
- Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
- Defendants-Appellants: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the case should be summarily dismissed due to the absence of a memorandum opposing the proposed dismissal.
Disposition
- The appeal was dismissed.
Reasons
Per Castillo J. (Fry C.J. and Garcia J. concurring): The Court of Appeals dismissed the case because no memorandum opposing the proposed summary dismissal was filed within the required timeframe. The absence of opposition to the proposed disposition led the Court to conclude that dismissal was appropriate. (headnotes)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.