AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

The case involves a dispute between the Plaintiff-Appellee and the Defendants-Appellees, including individuals and a professional corporation. The Deponent-Appellant is also a party to the case. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.

Procedural History

  • District Court of Taos County: The case was heard by District Judge Abigail Aragon. The details of the decision are not provided.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Defendants-Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Deponent-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • Whether the case should be summarily dismissed.

Disposition

  • The appeal was dismissed.

Reasons

Per Vigil J. (Wechsler and Vanzi JJ. concurring): The Court proposed summary dismissal in its notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the summary dismissal was filed within the allowed time, and as a result, the appeal was dismissed. (headnotes)