This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The Worker-Appellant filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits against the Employer-Appellee and its insurer, alleging entitlement to compensation for a workplace injury. The specific details of the injury or the circumstances surrounding it are not provided in the decision.
Procedural History
- Workers’ Compensation Administration, Gregory D. Griego, Workers’ Compensation Judge: The Workers’ Compensation Judge issued a decision, which is not detailed in the memorandum opinion.
Parties' Submissions
- Worker-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
- Employer/Insurer-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s decision should be affirmed.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge.
Reasons
Per Michael E. Vigil J. (Michael D. Bustamante and Celia Foy Castillo JJ. concurring): The Court proposed a summary affirmance in its notice of proposed summary disposition, citing reasons that are not detailed in the memorandum opinion. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed by the Worker-Appellant, and the time for filing such a memorandum expired. Consequently, the Court affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge. (headnotes)