This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The case involves a dispute between E&D Partnership, a Texas general partnership, and Gibson, Ochsner & Adkins, LLP, a law firm. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.
Procedural History
- E&D P'ship v. Gibson, Ochsner & Adkins, LLP, 132 N.M. 397, 49 P.3d 76 (2002): The New Mexico Court of Appeals issued a decision in the case. The holding of this decision is not specified in the text.
Parties' Submissions
- Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Petitioner (E&D Partnership): [Not applicable or not found]
- Third-Party Defendant-Respondent (Gibson, Ochsner & Adkins, LLP): [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the writ of certiorari issued by the Supreme Court of New Mexico should be quashed.
Disposition
- The Supreme Court of New Mexico quashed the writ of certiorari issued on June 14, 2002. (headnotes)
Reasons
-
Per Chief Justice Patricio M. Serna (Justices Pamela B. Minzner and Paul J. Kennedy concurring): The Court, after considering the briefs and arguments, determined that the writ of certiorari should be quashed. The reasoning for this decision is not elaborated in the text. (N/A)
-
Justice Gene E. Franchini and Justice Petra Jimenez Maes, dissenting: The dissenting justices disagreed with the majority's decision to quash the writ of certiorari. The basis for their dissent is not provided in the text.