This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The case involves a dispute between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant, with additional Interveners-Appellants joining the matter. The specific facts and events leading to the case are not detailed in the decision.
Procedural History
- District Court of Taos County, presided by Judge Abigail Aragon: The District Court issued a decision that was appealed by the Interveners-Appellants.
Parties' Submissions
- Interveners-Appellants: [Not applicable or not found]
- Defendant-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the District Court's decision should be affirmed in the absence of a memorandum opposing summary affirmance.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the District Court's decision.
Reasons
Per Roderick T. Kennedy J. (Linda M. Vanzi and Timothy L. Garcia JJ. concurring):
The Court of Appeals proposed a summary affirmance in its notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed by the Interveners-Appellants, and the time for filing such a memorandum had expired. Consequently, the Court affirmed the District Court's decision.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.