This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- The case involves a dispute between Anna Lee Heemsbergen (Plaintiff-Appellee) and John Givan (Defendant-Appellant), with Rebal Givan also named as a defendant. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.
Procedural History
- Appeal from the District Court of Hidalgo County, J.C. Robinson, District Judge
Parties' Submissions
- Plaintiff-Appellee: The specific arguments made by Anna Lee Heemsbergen are not detailed in the provided text.
- Defendant-Appellant: The specific arguments made by John Givan are not detailed in the provided text.
- Defendant (Rebal Givan): [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- (N/A)
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the district court's adverse decision against the Defendant-Appellant, John Givan (para 1).
Reasons
-
Per M. Monica Zamora, J. (J. Miles Hanisee, J., and Julie J. Vargas, J., concurring): The decision to affirm the district court's ruling was based on the Defendant-Appellant's failure to provide a proper address for service, resulting in the return of court notices unopened. The court highlighted that it is the Defendant's responsibility to ensure the court has a correct address for service. The time for filing a memorandum in opposition to the court's notices of proposed summary disposition expired without response from the Defendant-Appellant, leading to the affirmation of the district court's decision for reasons stated in those notices (para 1).