Supreme Court of New Mexico
Decision Information
Chapter 30 - Criminal Offenses - cited by 5,978 documents
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Filing Date: October 31, 2019
NO. S-1-SC-37377
PETER DEAN MENDOZA,
Petitioner,
v.
GERMAN FRANCO, Warden,
and STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
James Lawrence Sanchez, District Judge
Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender
C. David Henderson, Appellate Defender
MJ Edge, Assistant Appellate Defender
Santa Fe, NM
for Petitioner
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Margaret Jayne Crabb, Assistant Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM
for Respondents
DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF REVERSAL
{1} WHEREAS, this matter having come before the Court upon our grant, pursuant to Rule 12-501 NMRA, of Petitioner Peter Mendoza’s petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus; and
{2} The Court having considered the briefs and being otherwise fully informed on the issues and applicable law; and
{3} The Court finding that there is no reasonable likelihood that a decision or formal opinion of the Court, under the instant facts, would materially advance the law of the State; and
{4} The Court exercising its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(1), (2) NMRA to dispose of a case by order, decision, or memorandum opinion rather than formal opinion;
{5} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the district court to dismiss Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is reversed, that one of Petitioner’s convictions of NMSA 1978, Section 30-7-16 (2001) is vacated, and that this matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.
{6} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JUDITH K. NAKAMURA, Chief Justice
BARBARA J. VIGIL, Justice
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice
C. SHANNON BACON, Justice
DAVID K. THOMSON, Justice