Supreme Court of New Mexico
Decision Information
Elliott v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc. - cited by 5 documents
Williamson v. Smith - cited by 115 documents
Decision Content
TAOS SKI VALLEY, INC. V. ELLIOTT, 1972-NMSC-037, 83 N.M. 763, 497 P.2d 974 (S. Ct. 1972)
TAOS SKI VALLEY, INC., a corporation,
and, AMERICAN
EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation,
Petitioners,
vs.
ELIZABETH A. ELLIOTT, Respondent
No. 9434
SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO
1972-NMSC-037, 83 N.M. 763, 497 P.2d 974
June 02, 1972
Original Certiorari Proceeding
COUNSEL
MITCHELL, MITCHELL & ALLEY, Santa Fe, New Mexico, MONTGOMERY, FEDERICI, ANDREWS, HANNAHS & MORRIS, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Attorneys for Petitioners.
MATIAS A. ZAMORA, Santa Fe, New Mexico, RUSSELL MOORE, Kelleher & McLeod, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for Respondent.
JUDGES
McMANUS, Justice, wrote the opinion.
WE CONCUR:
J. C. Compton, C.J., LaFel E. Oman, J., Donnan Stephenson, J., Samuel Z. Montoya, J., not participating.
OPINION
McMANUS, Justice.
{1} By decision dated March 3, 1972, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's directed verdict in favor of the defendants herein, and ordered a new trial. Elliott v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc., 83 N.M. 575, 494 P.2d 1392. On March 23, 1972, this Court granted certiorari. After a careful review of the opinion, briefs and all pertinent material, we are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari was improvidently issued and we now affirm the decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals.
{2} In the decision of the Court of Appeals there appears language as follows:
"Taos Ski Valley raised the defense of assumption of risk. We cannot determine whether the directed verdict included this defense. However, since this case must be tried over, the defense is controlled by Williamson v. Smith, 83 N.M. 336, 491 P.2d 1147 (1971)."
{3} In order that there be no confusion involved we merely state that Williamson, supra, as concerns the defense of assumption of risk, unequivocally stated that such defense was prospective from the date of the {*764} Williamson decision, December 13, 1971, and not retroactive.
{4} The writ previously granted is hereby quashed.
{5} IT IS SO ORDERED.
WE CONCUR:
J. C. Compton, C.J., LaFel E. Oman, J., Donnan Stephenson, J., Samuel Z. Montoya, J., not participating.