Supreme Court of New Mexico
Decision Information
First Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Flournoy - cited by 81 documents
Hernandez v. Roberts - cited by 24 documents
Decision Content
BURLES V. ROBERTS, 1918-NMSC-087, 24 N.M. 256, 173 P. 1035 (S. Ct. 1918)
BURLES
vs.
ROBERTS et al. McTAVISH
v. SAME. BELLOMINI v. SAME.
Nos. 2242, 2243, 2244
SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO
1918-NMSC-087, 24 N.M. 256, 173 P. 1035
July 02, 1918, Decided
Appeal from District Court, McKinley County; Raynolds, Judge.
Separate actions by Charles Burles, by Robert H. McTavish, and by Nello Bellomini, against R. L. Roberts and others. From judgments dismissing the complaints on defendants' motion, plaintiff in each case appeals. Appeals dismissed.
SYLLABUS
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
Section 15, chapter 43, Laws 1917, interpreted, and held to have the effect of abating an appeal or writ of error where no cost bond is filed within the time required by the statute.
COUNSEL
A. T. HANNETT, of Gallup, for appellants.
WILSON & WALTON, of Silver City, and H. C. DENNY, of Gallup, for appellees.
JUDGES
PARKER, J. HANNA, C. J., and ROBERTS, J., concur.
OPINION
{*256} {1} OPINION OF THE COURT. PARKER, J. The facts in these cases are identical with those in Hernandez v. Roberts et al., 24 N.M. 253, 173 P. 1034, not yet officially reported, and for the reasons stated in that case the motion to dismiss the appeal will be granted; and it is so ordered.
HANNA, C. J., and ROBERTS, J., concur.