Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 101 documents
Decision Content
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-40206
JAMES ROUNDTREE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MARIA MEZTA and GEICO
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY
Lee A. Kirksey, District Judge
Law Offices of Ross Bettis
Ross R. Bettis
Hobbs, NM
for Appellant
Law Office of J. Douglas Compton
Pablo A. Seifert
Albuquerque, NM
for Appellees
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MEDINA, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants. Unpersuaded that Plaintiff’s docketing statement demonstrated error, we proposed to summarily affirm in a calendar notice. Defendants filed a memorandum in support of our proposed summary disposition. Plaintiff, however, has not responded to our proposed disposition, and the time for doing so has passed. “Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.” Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287. Thus, for the reasons provided in our calendar notice, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge
WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge