Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 101 documents
Decision Content
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-39139
GRETCHEN WELCH,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ABQ ROOF SYSTEMS, LLC,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY
James A. Noel, District Judge
Bauman & Dow, P.C.
Christopher P. Bauman
Cynthia L. Weisman
Albuquerque, NM
for Appellee
Calvert Menicucci, P.C.
Sean R. Calvert
Albuquerque, NM
for Appellant
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANISEE, Chief Judge.
{1} Defendant ABQ Roof Systems is appealing from a district court order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We issued a calendar notice on October 15, 2020, proposing to affirm. Plaintiff has responded with a memorandum in support. Defendant has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-210(D)(2) NMRA. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (stating that “[f]ailure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice”).
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge