Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Whatley v. Dep't of Corr.

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 12/21/2020
Docket Numbers A-1-CA-38566
Decision-maker(s) J. MILES HANISEE; KRISTINA BOGARDUS; MEGAN P. DUFFY
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Whatley v. Dep't of Corr. (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 12/21/2020
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-38566

ROYLENE WHATLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

PNM-NORTH, GREG MARCANTEL;

CENTURION MEDICARE; and DR.

BEN MARTINEZ,

Defendants-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
Denise Barela-Shepard, District Judge

Roylene Whatley

Las Cruces, NM

Pro Se Appellant

Park & Associates, LLC

Alfred A. Park

Lawrence M. Marcus

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellees

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1}       Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.