Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Bloom v. Boadwine

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 04/30/2019
Docket Numbers A-1-CA-37652
Decision-maker(s) J. MILES HANISEE; KRISTINA BOGARDUS; MEGAN P. DUFFY
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Bloom v. Boadwine (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 04/30/2019
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,887 documents

Decision Content

BLOOM V. BOADWINE

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

TARA JOY BLOOM,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL STEPHEN BOADWINE,
Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. A-1-CA-37652

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

April 30, 2019

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, David K. Thomson, District Judge

COUNSEL

Tara Joy Bloom, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellee

Michael Stephen Boadwine, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant.

JUDGES

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge. WE CONCUR:  KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge, MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

AUTHOR: J. MILES HANISEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge.

{1}       Summary affirmance in part and remand to the district court for clarification was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition.  No memorandum opposing the notice of summary disposition has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMAND TO DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARIFICATION.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.