Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
WILSON V. DAVIS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
KENT WILSON,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
MARY WILSON, along with Kent
Wilson, d/b/a K&M Properties,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BETH DAVIS,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
RICHARD JOSEPH and HANNA
JOSEPH,
Defendants.
NO. 34,333
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
April 27, 2015
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY, Sandra
A. Price, District Judge
COUNSEL
John Westerman, Farmington, NM, for Appellee
Beth Davis, Farmington, NM, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge