Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Stewart v. Stewart

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 04/27/2012
Docket Numbers 31,579
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; CELIA FOY CASTILLO; JAMES J. WECHSLER
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Stewart v. Stewart (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 04/27/2012
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

STEWART V. STEWART

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

HONEY STEWART,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
JOHN MICHAEL STEWART,
Respondent-Appellant.

No. 31,579

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

April 27, 2012


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF McKINLEY COUNTY, Louis E. Depauli, Jr., District Judge

COUNSEL

Rabb & Beal PLLC, Lloyd Rabb, III, Tucson, AZ, for Appellee

John Michael Stewart, Gallup, NM, Pro se Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge, JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

Affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

CELIA FOY CASTILLO

Chief Judge, JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.