Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State v. Wink

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 01/11/2011
Docket Numbers 30,666
Decision-maker(s) RODERICK T. KENNEDY; CYNTHIA A. FRY; MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - State v. Wink (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 01/11/2011
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. WINK

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
EVAN WINK,
Defendant-Appellant.

NO. 30,666

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 11, 2011


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Lisa C. Schultz, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Templeman & Crutchfield, P.A., C. Barry Crutchfield, Lovington, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge, MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

AUTHOR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KENNEDY, Judge.

Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

WE CONCUR:

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.