Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State v. Vigil

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 09/02/2009
Docket Numbers 29,420
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL E. VIGIL; RODERICK T. KENNEDY; TIMOTHY L. GARCIA
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - State v. Vigil (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 09/02/2009
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. VIGIL

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SARAH VIGIL,
Defendant-Appellant.

NO. 29,420

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

September 2, 2009


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Douglas R. Driggers, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Kelly O’Connell, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.