Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,887 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. VARGAS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ANNIE VARGAS,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 30,425
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
February 8, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY, Grant
L. Foutz, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
Steven F. Seeger, Gallup, NM, Advocate Law Center, P.A., Bobbie P. Franklin, Gallup, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
REVERSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge