Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State v. Temple

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 01/21/2016
Docket Numbers 34,889
Decision-maker(s) J. MILES HANISEE; JAMES J. WECHSLER; RODERICK T. KENNEDY
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - State v. Temple (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 01/21/2016
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. TEMPLE

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff,
v.
PETER TEMPLE,
Defendant,
IN RE KARA KUPPER,
Attorney-Appellant.

No. 34,889

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 21, 2016


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Stan Whitaker, District Judge

COUNSEL

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

AUTHOR: J. MILES HANISEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge.

{1}       Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       REVERSED.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.