Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State v. S. Madrid

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 03/16/2009
Docket Numbers 28,732
Decision-maker(s) JONATHAN B. SUTIN; MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; LINDA M. VANZI
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - State v. S. Madrid (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 03/16/2009
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,888 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. S MADRID

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
STEVEN ALEJO MADRID, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 28,732

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

March 16, 2009


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DONA ANA COUNTY, Mike Murphy, District Judge.

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee.

Jeffrey C. Lahann, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellant.

JUDGES

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

AUTHOR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

            Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

            AFFIRMED.

            IT IS SO ORDERED.

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.