Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. PENDERGAST
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JASON PENDERGAST,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. A-1-CA-35505
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
November 20, 2017
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY, Fred T.
Van Soelen, District Judge
COUNSEL
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
Aarons Law Firm, PC, Stephen D. Aarons, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge