Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State v. Montoya

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 05/05/2014
Docket Numbers 33,229
Decision-maker(s) M. MONICA ZAMORA; JONATHAN B. SUTIN; MICHAEL E. VIGIL
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - State v. Montoya (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 05/05/2014
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. MONTOYA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOE ANTHONY MONTOYA and
MARLENE MONTOYA,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 33,229

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

May 5, 2014


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, James A. Hall, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Bregman & Loman, P.C., Sam Bregman, Eric Loman, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants

JUDGES

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

AUTHOR: M. MONICA ZAMORA

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ZAMORA, Judge.

{1}       Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       DISMISSED.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.