Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. KIRVEN
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SHARON KIRVEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
NO. 34,188
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 28, 2015
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY, Fred Van
Soelen, District Judge
COUNSEL
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, Jacqueline R. Medina, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender, Allison H. Jaramillo, Assistant Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals her convictions for trafficking a controlled substance (cocaine) and solicitation to commit tampering with evidence. [DS 2] We issued an initial notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to affirm. After considering Defendant’s memorandum in opposition, we issued a second notice proposing summary reversal. The State has filed a response indicating that it does not oppose this disposition. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in our second notice of proposed summary disposition, we reverse.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge