Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State v. Jaksha

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 09/16/2014
Docket Numbers 33,442
Decision-maker(s) J. MILES HANISEE; JAMES J. WECHSLER; MICHAEL E. VIGIL
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - State v. Jaksha (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 09/16/2014
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. JAKSHA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MATTHEW JAKSHA,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 33,442

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

September 16, 2014


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY, William G. Shoobridge, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Fredlund & Bryan, LLC, Jon C. Fredlund, Hobbs, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

AUTHOR: J. MILES HANISEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge.

{1}       Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       AFFIRMED.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.