Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State v. Acosta

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 09/18/2014
Docket Numbers 33,434
Decision-maker(s) CYNTHIA A. FRY; JAMES J. WECHSLER; J. MILES HANISEE
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - State v. Acosta (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 09/18/2014
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. ACOSTA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DEVIN W. ACOSTA,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 33,434

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

September 18, 2014


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOA ANA COUNTY, Marci Beyer, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Clifford McIntyre, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

AUTHOR: CYNTHIA A. FRY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1}       Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.