Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
SCARBOROUGH V. C&S PARTNERSHIP
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
TONY SCARBOROUGH,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C&S PARTNERSHIP; DAK
PARTNERSHIP, LLC; RSC
CSP, LLC; AND JOHN
DOES 1, 2, 3, & 4,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 34,483
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 30, 2015
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RIO ARRIBA COUNTY,
Francis J. Mathew, District Judge
COUNSEL
Carlos Scarborough, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Walcott & Henry PC, Charles V. Henry, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} DISMISSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge