Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents
Decision Content
SECRIST V. NMSPO
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
DANIEL J. SECRIST and KEN
LONG, on their own behalf and
on behalf of a class of similarly-
situated State employees,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
NEW MEXICO STATE
PERSONNEL OFFICE, and
JUSTIN R. NAJAKA, New
Mexico State Personnel Director,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. A-1-CA-36950
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 5, 2018
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, David
K. Thomson, District Judge
COUNSEL
Shane Youtz, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
SaucedoChavez PC, Christopher Saucedo, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
JUDGES
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge. WE CONCUR: STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge, DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANISEE, Judge.
{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge