Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,888 documents
Decision Content
ROSWELL CLINIC V. W SEIDEL MD
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ROSWELL CLINIC CORP. INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W. RAY SEIDEL, JR., MD., Defendants-Appellee.
Docket No. 29,106
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
May 1, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY, James
Waylon Counts, District Judge.
COUNSEL
Bannerman & Williams, PA, John A. Bannerman, William G. Gilchrist, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant.
Tandy Hunt, PC, Tandy L. Hunt, Roswell, NM, for Appellee.
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge