Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Quintana v. Tapia

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 09/15/2011
Docket Numbers 31,011
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL E. VIGIL; CELIA FOY CASTILLO; JAMES J. WECHSLER
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Quintana v. Tapia (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 09/15/2011
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,882 documents

Decision Content

QUINTANA V. TAPIA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

DIEGO QUINTANA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ABRAN TAPIA, LORI MARANGAKIS,
and MARY GORDON,
Defendants-Appellees.

NO. 31,011

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

September 15, 2011


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, Abigail Aragon, District Court Judge

COUNSEL

Sommer Karnes & Associates, LLP, Karl H. Sommer, James R. Hawley, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant

Keleher & McLeod, P.A., Kurt Wihl, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge, JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

REVERSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

WE CONCUR:

CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.